.png)
Download Free The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Audio Books
Be Specific About Books In Pursuance Of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
| Original Title: | The Structure of Scientific Revolutions |
| ISBN: | 0226458083 (ISBN13: 9780226458083) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Thomas S. Kuhn
Paperback | Pages: 226 pages Rating: 4.01 | 21447 Users | 1092 Reviews
Point About Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
| Title | : | The Structure of Scientific Revolutions |
| Author | : | Thomas S. Kuhn |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | 3rd |
| Pages | : | Pages: 226 pages |
| Published | : | 1996 by University of Chicago Press (first published 1962) |
| Categories | : | Science. Philosophy. Nonfiction. History. Sociology. History Of Science. Classics |
Rendition During Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Thomas S. Kuhn's classic book is now available with a new index.
"A landmark in intellectual history which has attracted attention far beyond its own immediate field. . . . It is written with a combination of depth and clarity that make it an almost unbroken series of aphorisms. . . . Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, [this book] has been a resounding success." —Nicholas Wade, Science
"Perhaps the best explanation of [the] process of discovery." —William Erwin Thompson, New York Times Book Review
"Occasionally there emerges a book which has an influence far beyond its originally intended audience. . . . Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . . . has clearly emerged as just such a work." —Ron Johnston, Times Higher Education Supplement
"Among the most influential academic books in this century." —Choice
One of "The Hundred Most Influential Books Since the Second World War," Times Literary Supplement
Rating About Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Ratings: 4.01 From 21447 Users | 1092 ReviewsAssessment About Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
10/10. Sixth ever perfect nonfiction rating: 'Structure' is not overrated at all.This is the scientific counterpart to the invaluable work of Alisdair MacIntyre in philosophy. Those works ('After Virtue', 'Whose Justice?', 'Three Rival Versions') are some of the most important for understanding the practice of philosophy and the seemingly-insurmountable aporiae in philosophy and ethics.Kuhn's work does the same for science, is extensible to many other disciplines, and is the only work I'm awareI first read Kuhn's book during my first year as a Ph.D. student, and found it rather interesting. It challenges notions of scientific progress as liner by suggesting instead a process of "paradigm shift." Essentially, Kuhn argues that researchers in a branch of science accept as normal a set of "received beliefs" that guide and bound their investigations into new phenomena. Because of this set of accepted beliefs and assumptions, new ways of looking at the world are often suppressed or ignored.
Scientists are so passionate about their work, and even if you're a scientist yourself it can sometimes take you by surprise to see just how passionate they are. A few years ago, when I was working at NASA, we made up a game called If Research Were Romance. Here, let me show you how to play.In real life, Thomas Kuhn wrote a book about paradigm changes in science. But if research were romance, he might have written a book about relationships instead. It might have been quite similar in many ways.
Original, 2-star review:I think the common criticisms that have been popping up here - Kuhn's conclusions are very relativistic, and he's not always clear or concise in the way he conveys them - are fair. Kuhn puts forth a very interesting theory, and I think at least a few sections are very helpful when approaching the history of science. But it's certainly not a fun read, and much of the argument's density could have been fairly easily avoided. If you're a scientist, or have an interest in the
Best review I have read. Thank you! I just finished reading Kuhn.
Kuhn hit on an interesting idea. Sometimes new discoveries lead to a foundational crisis. The foundation in an area of science come into question and that is when the view of the world changes. I don't think it is so much that science goes through periods of suppressing anomalies while it solves puzzles merely that some puzzles hit the bedrock of unexamined assumptions and revising assumptions can be a messy business. the Twentieth Century examples of Relativity and QM are foremost in the mind
Related Posts
0 Comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.